When Target-Date Funds May No Longer Serve Retirees Well

Target-date funds have long been a go-to investment vehicle for workers building retirement savings, offering automatic asset allocation that shifts toward more conservative holdings as a set retirement year approaches. Yet financial planners note these funds were largely designed with the accumulation phase in mind — not the often more complicated decisions that follow once workers actually stop earning a paycheck.

Once in retirement, individuals must navigate a range of financial moves that target-date funds are not structured to address, including decisions around Social Security claiming strategies, required minimum distributions, healthcare costs, and tax-efficient withdrawal sequencing. A single all-in-one fund cannot easily account for a retiree's broader financial picture, including outside income sources, estate planning goals, or varying spending needs across the early, middle, and late stages of retirement.

Read more New Buy Now Pay Later Rules Bring Affordability Checks for Shoppers →

Financial advisers generally suggest that the point at which target-date funds may warrant replacement — or at least supplementation — is when a retiree's situation becomes individualized enough that a standardized glide path no longer reflects their actual risk tolerance, timeline, or income needs. For some, that transition may begin several years before retirement; for others, it surfaces only after they have left the workforce and find the fund's allocation no longer matches their withdrawals strategy.

The core critique is not that target-date funds are poorly constructed, but that they are built for a generalized investor archetype. As retirement progresses and financial circumstances grow more specific, the one-size-fits-all design can become a liability rather than a convenience.

Continue reading at MarketWatch.com