Splitting a Family Business Between Two Sons: Estate Planning Dilemmas at 64

A 64-year-old entrepreneur with two adult sons is wrestling with how to divide ownership of a family business when only one son is actively involved in its operations, raising a question that estate planners and family business advisers encounter with increasing frequency as the baby-boom generation approaches wealth transfer.

The parent is considering leaving approximately 70% of the business to the son who works in the firm, reflecting his day-to-day contributions and investment of time. The remaining 30% would go to the other son, who has no operational role. Complicating the calculus, the parent has expressed reservations about the long-term stability of the non-working son's marriage — a concern that carries real financial weight, since a divorce could expose a business stake to division in court proceedings.

Read more New Buy Now Pay Later Rules Bring Affordability Checks for Shoppers →

Estate attorneys routinely advise clients in this position to explore structural tools that can protect business continuity while still treating heirs equitably. Options often include buy-sell agreements, life insurance policies sized to equalize inheritances across assets, or placing business interests inside trusts with carefully drafted terms. None of those mechanisms were specified in the original inquiry, underscoring how much complexity these decisions carry even before attorneys or financial planners enter the conversation.

The scenario illustrates a broader challenge facing family-owned businesses in the United States, where succession planning is frequently delayed or left incomplete. When one heir is embedded in a company and another is not, equal division can destabilize the business, while unequal division risks family conflict — leaving owners to balance fairness, practicality, and relationships simultaneously.

Continue reading at MarketWatch.com